Charts
NFL Teams Ranked How Much They Paid Players Not on Their Team in 2020
In the National Football League, the good teams are good for a reason, and the bad teams usually stay bad.
We’re approaching one of the most exciting times of the NFL offseason each year, as the league’s free agency period will open on March 17. Players who are designated as free agents can now have the ability to sign with any franchise in the league, and those teams with plenty of room to spend money will look to improve their team and make an impact for the following season. However, we see it every year – while some signings will be hits for teams, there will be plenty of misses by clubs around the league.
From Reddit user /u/fortune_auto, this visual based on the 2020 NFL season shows how much each team paid the salaries of players who weren’t even on their team. This is what’s known as dead salary-cap money, which is money being paid to a player who was traded or released before his contract expired. The visual itself is simple and the point, as it needs to be with ranking them, and showing that the teams who struggled with the cap likely didn’t make the postseason.
Click below to zoom

The five teams that paid the most money to players no longer on their team were the Carolina Panthers, New York Jets, Jacksonville Jaguars, Miami Dolphins, and Minnesota Vikings. None of these teams made the postseason in 2020. In fact, of the 20 teams in the league who paid the money in dead cap space, only five (25%) made the postseason. Of the twelve franchises that spent the least in this area, eight of them (66.66%) made it to the playoffs.
These are the five largest dead-cap hits in the history of the National Football League, according to CBS Sports.
- Carson Wentz (Philadelphia Eagles): $33.8 million
- Jared Goff (Los Angeles Rams): $22.2 million
- Brandin Cooks (Los Angeles Rams): $21.8 million
- Antonio Brown (Pittsburgh Steelers): $21.2 million
- Matthew Stafford (Detroit Lions): $19.9 million
Charts
America’s Birthday Patterns Reveal Demographics in New Chart
Have you ever noticed that certain months seem to have daily birthdays in your social circle? Kremp Florist’s new study shows birth patterns that reveal remarkable consistency in when people are born and interesting age variations across the states. Through analysis of data from 29.8 million births recorded from the CDC WONDER Natality database and nearly 16 million census survey responses, the data unveils hidden demographic patterns that shape everything from our family planning to regional economics.
Click here to zoom.
The standout finding is in the most popular birth month. August is by far the most common birth month in 45 out of 50 states. This consistency reflects a few factors that we can tie to conception periods. Late fall to early winter is an ideal time to start a pregnancy. Counting nine months back from August indicates a conception period in November to December. Chill outdoor temperatures encourage more intimate indoor time, and festive dates like Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s provide opportunities for relaxation and celebration. The positive mood can foster romantic connections.
Science also supports this pattern, suggesting that sperm quality peaks during the winter months and declines in the summer heat since sperm prefer a cooler environment, and high temperatures reduce the quantity and mobility of sperm. Female fertility is affected by the seasons, too. Shorter fall and winter days boost melatonin production, which supports the circadian rhythms that stabilize fertility hormones like prolactin.
The data also goes so far as to reveal the most common single birthday in America. While August dominates the monthly birthday rate, the most common individual birthday is September 9th. There have been about 12,301 birthdays celebrated annually on that day for the past 20 years. This specific birthday is a shared experience for many people, including celebrities like Adam Sandler, Otis Redding, Michael Bublé, Hugh Grant, Leo Tolstoy, and Colonel Sanders.
The team’s analysis also shows us state-by-state age demographics that reflect economic opportunities, migration patterns, and other cultural factors. Maine is the oldest state in America, with a median age of 55. Populations there are living longer, and birth rates are on the decline. Utah has the youngest population, with an average age of 37. The youthful makeup of Utah stems from the state’s high birth rates and youthful urban population.
We generally see older populations in northeastern states like Vermont, New Hampshire, and Delaware. Western and mountain states skew younger, like in Idaho, Texas, and Colorado. These demographics are influenced by economic development, healthcare demands, educational opportunities, and other factors that influence migration to and from the state and longevity.
Kremp’s graphic shows some fascinating regional patterns and consistency trends in ages and birth timing. All these factors help shape America’s diverse landscape and unique regional identities.
Charts
Chart Shows Where Retirement Dreams Meet Financial Reality With State Ranking by Affordability
Retirement is a hard-earned chapter of life where older people can escape the daily grind of a busy workweek to focus on their health, relaxation, and quality time with loved ones. While many potential retirees dream of warm weather and sandy beaches, they’re forced to make plans based on financial realities. Many people want to know where they can stretch their savings the farthest. Each state offers its own charms and advantages, but the team at Ooma presents the real financial situation with a ranking by affordability.
Click below to zoom.
A Stark Financial Divide
Ooma’s analysis reveals dramatic differences in cost across each statement in America. They’ve determined the minimum savings needed to get by, and the results ranged from a modest $713,000 in West Virginia to a huge sum of $2.2 million in Hawaii. Their research combined nine factors to create the 400-point scoring system. Categories included savings thresholds, assisted living costs, tax burdens, memory care expenses, healthcare expenditures, and home care rates. Combined, this score reflects the true cost of retirement.
We see Hawaii emerging as the most expensive state to retire in by far. Their geographic isolation drives up the cost of living, which is common for island life. Assisted living costs are staggering, too, at $139,807 per year, and memory care reaches $11,000 a month. These costs can suck up retirement savings fast. California was the second-most expensive state, followed by Massachusetts, which both prove how steep the price of a fun lifestyle or premium healthcare can be.
The Budget-Friendly States
At the opposite end of the spectrum lies Mississippi, the most affordable state to retire in. Assisted living costs about $54,943 a year and home care costs about $25 an hour, which creates a great option for budget-conscious retirees. Alabama and Oklahoma are also on the affordable end of the spectrum, combining low living costs with affordable healthcare and tax-friendly policies.
Tax Policy Makes a Powerful Impact
State tax policies create significant cost differences between states that affect basic living expenses. Seven states on the list earned a “very tax-friendly” status due to eliminating most retirement-related taxes. These states were Alaska, Florida, Nevada, Wyoming, South Dakota, Georgia, and Mississippi. These states don’t tax retirement income or Social Security benefits and have minimal property taxes. On the other end of the scale, California, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Minnesota, and Nebraska have the heaviest tax burdens which can eat up to 10.73% of income. These factors can’t be ignored when considering retirement costs.
Considering Healthcare Cost
Healthcare expenses are significant for aging people, and Utah has the most affordable healthcare, while New York has the most expensive healthcare. However, it’s important to consider that price often reflects healthcare quality. Massachusetts, Connecticut, and New York have the most expensive healthcare but are also the highest rated.
Paying for a Lifestyle
Despite high costs, we can see on the chart that some of the most expensive states are the most popular. Hawaii, California, and Florida are the retirement dream for anyone seeking warm weather and beautiful beaches. Luckily, research like the data presented here can help people effectively plan for whatever retirement future they dream of.
Charts
Study Reveals How Age Shapes Social Media Preferences
Social media platforms connect billions of people worldwide every day, but these platforms aren’t uniform. They’re diverse micro-societies reflecting different age groups at different rates. Ooma’s new infographic analyzes social media usage patterns to deliver insights about generational preferences and a picture of the digital landscape’s influence on information spread.
The Ooma team used data from the Pew Research Center’s Social Media Fact Sheet and other reputable sources of social media demographics. Their approach gives us domestic and global information on platform usage numbers, which is valuable for researchers, marketers, and the digitally curious.
Click below to zoom.
A stand-out finding is YouTube’s enormous popularity across all American age groups. The platform brags 93% usage among 18–29-year-olds, 94% among 30–49-year-olds, 86% among 50–64-year-olds, and 65% among those 65 and older. YouTube is so widely used that it’s the second-largest search platform after Google. Anyone who wants quick video results can turn to YouTube to ask questions, but more than that, it’s a source of entertainment and education, too. With something for everyone, it’s no wonder YouTube is universally popular.
Facebook offered us some surprising data. It’s usually considered a platform for older generations, but the data defies this stereotype and shows us a platform with cross-generational appeal. 68% of people between 18 and 29 reported Facebook usage, and 78% between ages 30 and 49 did too. These numbers among younger people are nothing to sneeze at. Facebook has over 3 billion users worldwide, with a user base that clearly encompasses more than baby boomers and Generation X. Facebook’s staying power is impressive given the rise of up-and-coming apps like TikTok and Snapchat.
While YouTube and Facebook enjoy universal appeal, the infographic does reveal some age-based patterns for certain platforms. TikTok is certainly popular among younger users, with 59% of people aged 18 to 29 reporting that they use it, and only 10% of users over 65. TikTok’s user base tends to be young worldwide, with 30% of its users aged 18 to 24, and 21% between 13 and 17.
LinkedIn skews much older with usage peaking among 50- to 64-year-olds. This is no surprise as LinkedIn is primarily a professional platform made for business connections rather than entertainment or social sharing.
The data also reflects major shake-ups in a social media company that affect user bases. X, formerly known as Twitter, lost 2.7 million active users in just two months in December of 2024 after actions taken by CEO Elon Musk. The platform seems most geared toward people between 18 and 34, who comprise 34% of the user base.
These patterns show how age groups can affect social media usage and suggest what aspects of a platform attract different groups. The findings underscore how important it is for platforms of all kinds to adapt to changing culture and demographic needs or risk being left behind as exciting new platforms rise to take their place.
-
Business Visualizations11 months ago
Everything Owned by Apple
-
Business Visualizations10 months ago
America’s Most Valuable Companies Ranked by Profit per Employee
-
Business Visualizations3 months ago
The Biggest Employers by Industry
-
Business Visualizations6 months ago
The Biggest Fortune 500 Company in Every State
-
Maps2 years ago
Penis Lengths Around the World
-
Timelines2 years ago
A History of the Oldest Flags in the World
-
Charts2 years ago
The Most Promiscuous Countries in the World
-
Business Visualizations2 years ago
How Many Companies Does Elon Musk Own?